The BBC has a news article (here, written by Bethany Bell) about a burial shroud which was found in a tomb in Jerusalem and dates to the time of Christ. They state that it is the “first time” that such a shroud has been found. The new discovery is naturally compared to the Turin Shroud which many believe was Jesus’ burial cloth.
The recent discovery is different from the Shroud of Turin in that it is a simple two-way weave while the Turin cloth was a complicated weave.
I have no idea whether the Shroud of Turin is genuine or not. I know that there are many who would die for the belief that it is the real thing, showing us what Jesus actually looked like. Meanwhile others claim to have all the evidence that it is a fraud.
The recent discovery is different from the Shroud of Turin in that it is a simple two-way weave while the Turin cloth was a complicated weave.
I have no idea whether the Shroud of Turin is genuine or not. I know that there are many who would die for the belief that it is the real thing, showing us what Jesus actually looked like. Meanwhile others claim to have all the evidence that it is a fraud.
The Shroud of Turin
What truly amazes me is the arrogance that demonstrates itself through the researchers when they describe the importance of this find. This really is nothing new. After all, one can find the same type of conclusions drawn from archaeological finds regarding the origin of species. One skull is found, or maybe even just a jawbone and the timeline for a whole species is defined.
Human Evolution: Filling in the Blanks
The conclusions drawn from this discovery seem almost as grand. In the BBC article, Bethany Bell states:
This, we are told, is the “first time” pieces of a burial shroud have been found from the time of Jesus. That would make this the only burial shroud ever found from that time (except for maybe the Turin cloth). Yet this one discovery is sufficient evidence for the researchers to conclude that this burial cloth was typical for those used at the time and subsequently to decide that the Turin Shroud was a fake. This strikes me either as incredible arrogance, or great faith! You either know what all the other clothes were like at the time (based on one find?), or you have a firm belief that they were all the same. But are we not told time and again that faith has no place in science?
What is it about science that makes people lose all humility, that makes people believe they have all the answers – to everything? In the modern era many believed that technology would solve all the world’s problems. We would live to a ripe old age, free of war, poverty, famine, and disease. Then the world wars hit Europe and many changed their minds.
But still many scientists believe they can know everything, even if their conclusions are drawn from just one cloth or one bone fragment. I firmly believe in the pursuit of knowledge. But knowledge without humility is arrogance. Few seem to agree with the well known quote, “The more I know, the more I know I don’t know.”
It isn’t only the scientists who virtually worship knowledge and technology. In a recent BBC interview concerning global warming a specialist from India was asked whether we need to be concerned about climate change. He didn’t really think it was a problem as he was convinced that future technology would be able to fix all of today’s mistakes.
Some people choose to look to science for all the answers to life, refusing to acknowledge that faith plays any role in their decisions. Others choose to make God part of their lives, thereby acknowledging that faith plays a role in life.
The BBC report about the burial cloth states another interesting bit of information. The researchers believe the man in the grave had leprosy. That would have made him the earliest proven case of leprosy. They also believe that he was a member of the aristocracy or was a high priest.
"The researchers believe that the fragments are typical of the burial cloths used at the time of Jesus.
As a result, they conclude that the Turin Shroud did not originate from 1st Century Jerusalem."
This, we are told, is the “first time” pieces of a burial shroud have been found from the time of Jesus. That would make this the only burial shroud ever found from that time (except for maybe the Turin cloth). Yet this one discovery is sufficient evidence for the researchers to conclude that this burial cloth was typical for those used at the time and subsequently to decide that the Turin Shroud was a fake. This strikes me either as incredible arrogance, or great faith! You either know what all the other clothes were like at the time (based on one find?), or you have a firm belief that they were all the same. But are we not told time and again that faith has no place in science?
What is it about science that makes people lose all humility, that makes people believe they have all the answers – to everything? In the modern era many believed that technology would solve all the world’s problems. We would live to a ripe old age, free of war, poverty, famine, and disease. Then the world wars hit Europe and many changed their minds.
But still many scientists believe they can know everything, even if their conclusions are drawn from just one cloth or one bone fragment. I firmly believe in the pursuit of knowledge. But knowledge without humility is arrogance. Few seem to agree with the well known quote, “The more I know, the more I know I don’t know.”
It isn’t only the scientists who virtually worship knowledge and technology. In a recent BBC interview concerning global warming a specialist from India was asked whether we need to be concerned about climate change. He didn’t really think it was a problem as he was convinced that future technology would be able to fix all of today’s mistakes.
Some people choose to look to science for all the answers to life, refusing to acknowledge that faith plays any role in their decisions. Others choose to make God part of their lives, thereby acknowledging that faith plays a role in life.
The BBC report about the burial cloth states another interesting bit of information. The researchers believe the man in the grave had leprosy. That would have made him the earliest proven case of leprosy. They also believe that he was a member of the aristocracy or was a high priest.